Greetings, TXT!
I have you all set up in the sandbox here.
I will move equations as you complete them and attempt to match any duplicates for you.
Keep up the great work!
gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_283_01.jpg
I am not sure how to interpret mathematically this equation …
gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_332_01.jpg I am assuming below that each of bi and ybi and cj and ycj are “one thing” and they do not represent multiplications. The authoring would be different if they mean multiplication.
[moved to sandbox]
gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_355_02.jpg top equation Here I assume EAb and Gt are multiplications.
gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_355_02.jpg bottom equation Same assumption that EAb and Gt are multiplications.
gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_538_03.jpg
Hi @txt …
Here is the location of gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_283_01.jpg in the Title 24 document – http://ftp.resource.org/codes.gov/bsc.ca.gov/gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2.html#p282
Search for “2109.3.1.2.4 Modulus of rupture determination.” (To Do: better internal linking capabilities )
@txt
… the location of gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_332_01.jpg is approximately here … http://ftp.resource.org/codes.gov/bsc.ca.gov/gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2.html#s2211A (search for “2211A.2.2 Beam-to-column strength ratio.”)
… and gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_355_02.jpg is approximately here … http://ftp.resource.org/codes.gov/bsc.ca.gov/gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2.html#p354 (search for “2305.3 Shear wall deflection”)
… and gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_538_03.jpg is approximately here … http://ftp.resource.org/codes.gov/bsc.ca.gov/gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2.html#p537 (search for “3104F.2.3.2.5 Refined analyses.”)
No trackbacks yet.
Greetings, TXT!
I have you all set up in the sandbox here.
I will move equations as you complete them and attempt to match any duplicates for you.
Keep up the great work!
gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_283_01.jpg
I am not sure how to interpret mathematically this equation …
gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_332_01.jpg
I am assuming below that each of bi and ybi and cj and ycj are “one thing” and they do not represent multiplications. The authoring would be different if they mean multiplication.
[moved to sandbox]
gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_355_02.jpg
top equation
Here I assume EAb and Gt are multiplications.
[moved to sandbox]
gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_355_02.jpg
bottom equation
Same assumption that EAb and Gt are multiplications.
[moved to sandbox]
gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_538_03.jpg
[moved to sandbox]
Hi @txt …
Here is the location of gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_283_01.jpg in the Title 24 document – http://ftp.resource.org/codes.gov/bsc.ca.gov/gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2.html#p282
Search for “2109.3.1.2.4 Modulus of rupture determination.” (To Do: better internal linking capabilities
)
@txt
… the location of gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_332_01.jpg is approximately here … http://ftp.resource.org/codes.gov/bsc.ca.gov/gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2.html#s2211A (search for “2211A.2.2 Beam-to-column strength ratio.”)
… and gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_355_02.jpg is approximately here … http://ftp.resource.org/codes.gov/bsc.ca.gov/gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2.html#p354 (search for “2305.3 Shear wall deflection”)
… and gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_538_03.jpg is approximately here … http://ftp.resource.org/codes.gov/bsc.ca.gov/gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2.html#p537 (search for “3104F.2.3.2.5 Refined analyses.”)