• rdcHQ
  • RDC BLOG
  • About The Program
    • About The Founder
    • Meet The RDC
      • The Cobwebs Crew
      • Jenn Covington
      • Oceana Rain Fields
        • Oceana’s Illustrations
      • Christopher Garcia
        • Christopher’s CSS
      • Nathan Malamud
      • Becca Malamud Ozer
      • Jasper Shumaker-Pruitt
      • Levi Thompson
      • webchickbot
    • Friends of the RDC
    • RDC Projects
      • OLPC Contributors Program (2009)
      • North Curry Community Radio (2008)
      • E-book Enlightenment (2010)
      • New Artists Productions Website (2011)
      • California Building Codes (2011)
        • MathML Track (2011)
          • MathML Mosh I
          • MathML Mosh II
          • MathML Mosh III
          • MathML Mosh IV
          • MathML Mosh V
        • SVG Track (2011)
      • CCR (2012)
        • MathML and DocGen
          Track (2012)
        • SVG Track (2012)
      • #rdcHQ Extra Credit ✳
    • RDC Home Movies
  • Buy Our Stuff
  • RDC UI Lab
    • Resource Library
      • /docs
    • Under The Hood
    • WorkSpace 2013
      • Codes of the World (2013)
      • deBUG Days (2013)
      • Cobwebs (2013)
      • POCSA (Beta v.1)
        • Earth-Day-PHS
  • WHERE IS THE BOOKMOBILE?
  • MoaTD

MathML Mosh II

  • July 25th, 2011
  • By rdcHQ
I
II
III
IV
V






































  • MathML Mosh II
  • Comments ( 8 )
  • Trackbacks ( 0 )
Write comment
    • admin
    • July 29th, 2011 9:27pm
    • REPLY
    • QUOTE

    Greetings, TXT!

    I have you all set up in the sandbox here.

    I will move equations as you complete them and attempt to match any duplicates for you.

    Keep up the great work!

    • txt
    • August 2nd, 2011 1:16am
    • REPLY
    • QUOTE

    gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_283_01.jpg

    I am not sure how to interpret mathematically this equation …

    • txt
    • August 2nd, 2011 1:35am
    • REPLY
    • QUOTE

    gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_332_01.jpg
    I am assuming below that each of bi and ybi and cj and ycj are “one thing” and they do not represent multiplications. The authoring would be different if they mean multiplication.

    [moved to sandbox]

    • txt
    • August 2nd, 2011 1:35am
    • REPLY
    • QUOTE

    gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_355_02.jpg
    top equation
    Here I assume EAb and Gt are multiplications.

    [moved to sandbox]

    • txt
    • August 2nd, 2011 1:36am
    • REPLY
    • QUOTE

    gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_355_02.jpg
    bottom equation
    Same assumption that EAb and Gt are multiplications.

    [moved to sandbox]

    • txt
    • August 2nd, 2011 1:36am
    • REPLY
    • QUOTE

    gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_538_03.jpg

    [moved to sandbox]

    • admin
    • August 2nd, 2011 3:01am
    • REPLY
    • QUOTE

    Hi @txt …

    Here is the location of gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_283_01.jpg in the Title 24 document – http://ftp.resource.org/codes.gov/bsc.ca.gov/gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2.html#p282

    Search for “2109.3.1.2.4 Modulus of rupture determination.” (To Do: better internal linking capabilities :-) )

    • admin
    • August 2nd, 2011 3:11am
    • REPLY
    • QUOTE

    @txt

    … the location of gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_332_01.jpg is approximately here … http://ftp.resource.org/codes.gov/bsc.ca.gov/gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2.html#s2211A (search for “2211A.2.2 Beam-to-column strength ratio.”)

    … and gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_355_02.jpg is approximately here … http://ftp.resource.org/codes.gov/bsc.ca.gov/gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2.html#p354 (search for “2305.3 Shear wall deflection”)

    … and gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2_538_03.jpg is approximately here … http://ftp.resource.org/codes.gov/bsc.ca.gov/gov.ca.bsc.2010.02.2.html#p537 (search for “3104F.2.3.2.5 Refined analyses.”)

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Click here to cancel reply.
Return top